Authored by Cello Health, now part of Lumanity

One of the more cheering studies to emerge from the torrent of scientific and clinical papers published on Covid-19/SARS-CoV2 is a meta-analysis of patients in intensive care units (ICU) from around the world.1

It found tumbling rates for mortality.2 In the months from January to March (in an admittedly small number of patients, largely from China, with correspondingly large confidence intervals) studies reported that 59.5% of patients admitted to an ICU died. In studies published in April the reported mortality rate had fallen to a mean of 45.2%. By May, in a bigger largely European population, the reported proportion of ICU patients dying was down to a mean 24.7% (and the number of patients in the studies was 8,523). In just a few weeks, reported mortality rates have more than halved.

That is still a high mortality rate, and the percentage masks the individual tragedies of hundreds of thousands of deaths, many of which were arguably preventable by a swifter, public health led policy responses enabling systematic action. And deaths in ICU represent a minority of COVID-19 deaths.

Triumph of evidence

Yet it represents a triumph of an evidence-based approach to clinical management of COVID-19 on many fronts. The role of ventilators, once thought crucial for many patients, has been revised as it became clear that there is a cohort of patients where they do more harm than good and where less invasive forms of oxygenation are a better choice.

Ineffective and potentially harmful interventions have been dropped from use, while interventions shown to be effective are more widely used.

Among effective treatments are dexamethasone, an ‘old’ steroid found to have a significant mortality benefit, probably by suppressing the cytokine storm that is a clinical characteristic of more severe forms of Covid-19.3 Another is remdesivir an antiviral agent that inhibits viral RNA synthesis and found to significantly shorten the time Covid-19 patients need to spend in ICU.

Since May remdesivir (Veklury) has had Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 in the US, and similar authorization in Europe, based on the positive preliminary findings of a trial from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and other evidence.4

Now the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted remdesivir a wider EUA arguing ‘it is reasonable to believe that the known and potential benefits of Veklury when used for the treatment of COVID-19…outweigh its known and potential risks’.5

This decision follows the publication of results from the SIMPLE trial in JAMA, which found significant improvement in clinical status in those with moderate COVID-19 (a positive PCR test, pulmonary infiltrates and room-air oxygen saturation > 94%) treated with a 5-day course of remdesivir.6 While positive overall, the study was not unproblematic; in particular there was a study arm in which patients were randomised to 10 days of remdesivir treatment (in fact receiving a mean 6 days of treatment) where outcomes at day 11 were not statistically different to standard of care.

Unknown unknowns

There was a description of trial limitations that could be summarized as saying ‘if only we’d known what we know now, we would have done this trial differently and the outcomes we would measure are not the ones we did measure’. That is, perhaps, one of the prices to pay for designing a pioneering trial in the midst of a medical emergency and at a time of relative ignorance.

Future COVID-19 trials will be able to assess clinical impact with greater subtlety, but remdesivir looks to be a crucial and secure part of an overall management approach that is reducing deaths and time spent with life-threatening disease in ICU.

Perhaps, by analogy with HIV and hepatitis C, combinations of remdesivir with other antivirals will be found to be able to keep SARS-CoV-2 infection at bay. There are trials of antiviral combinations in place to test the hypothesis, and others, no doubt, in the planning stages.

The speed of improvement in clinical care of COVID-19 has been staggering. The hope must be for a new normal where COVID-19 becomes, like most forms of viral pneumonia, a serious and unpleasant condition, but one that is survivable for the vast majority of those infected (providing, of course, they have access to good medical care).

“A new normal where Covid-19 is, like most forms of viral pneumonia, a serious and unpleasant – but mostly survivable – condition”1


  1. Armstrong RA, Kane AD, Cook TM. Outcomes from intensive care in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(10):1340-1349. doi:10.1111/anae.15201.
  2. Armstrong RA, Kane AD, Cook TM. Decreasing mortality rates in ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia. 2021;76 Suppl 3:10. doi:10.1111/anae.15230.
  3. RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693-704. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436.
  4. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 – Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):1813-1826. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764.
  5. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). COVID-19 Update: FDA Broadens Emergency Use Authorization for Veklury (remdesivir) to Include All Hospitalized Patients for Treatment of COVID-19. FDA. 2020.
  6. Spinner CD, Gottlieb RL, Criner GJ, et al. Effect of Remdesivir vs Standard Care on Clinical Status at 11 Days in Patients With Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;324(11):1048-1057. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.16349.